The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition Or Regulation? (Critical Perspectives On Animals: Theory, Culture, Science, And Law)
The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition Or Regulation? (Critical Perspectives On Animals: Theory, Culture, Science, And Law)

The Animal Rights Debate: Abolition Or Regulation? (Critical Perspectives On Animals: Theory, Culture, Science, And Law)

  • Publish Date: 2010-10-26
  • Binding: Paperback
Vendor
Columbia University Press
Regular price
$47.23
Sale price
$46.70
Quantity must be 1 or more

Attention: For textbook, access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items.

Arrives in 3-7 Business Days

Gary L. Francione is a law professor and leading philosopher of animal rights theory. Robert Garner is a political theorist specializing in the philosophy and politics of animal protection. Francione maintains that we have no moral justification for using nonhumans and argues that because animals are propertyor economic commoditieslaws or industry practices requiring humane treatment will, as a general matter, fail to provide any meaningful level of protection. Garner favors a version of animal rights that focuses on eliminating animal suffering and adopts a protectionist approach, maintaining that although the traditional animal-welfare ethic is philosophically flawed, it can contribute strategically to the achievement of animal-rights ends.

As they spar, Francione and Garner deconstruct the animal protection movement in the United States, the United Kingdom, Europe, and elsewhere, discussing the practices of such organizations as PETA, which joins with McDonald's and other animal users to improve the slaughter of animals. They also examine American and European laws and campaigns from both the rights and welfare perspectives, identifying weaknesses and strengths that give shape to future legislation and action.

Customer Reviews